- The Decentralised
- Posts
- 'Aave will win'? đ¤
'Aave will win'? đ¤
Stani Kulechov says the quiet part out loud.
GM, Tim here.
On Sunday, Aave creator and Aave Labs CEO Stani Kulechov made a bold proclamation: Aave will win.
Aave DAO, the cooperative that governs the $45 billion DeFi lender, had just passed a landmark vote that redefines its relationship with Kulechovâs company.
In exchange for the DAO providing funding to Aave Labs, starting with a whopping $25 million in stablecoins and 75,000 AAVE tokens, the firm will direct 100% of revenue from Aave-branded products directly to the Aave DAO treasury.
It addresses a months-long argument between the DAO and Labs over who should receive revenue from a swap feature on the Aave website, the main way to access the lending protocol.
Thereâs just one snag.
Three of Aave DAOâs biggest service providers â organisations that have been with the DAO for years â announced their intention to break from the collective in the leadup to the vote.
While each organisation has specific reasons for leaving, their complaints follow a common theme: a dislike of what they call a growing centralisation of power around Aave Labs.
Aave DAO departures
The Aave DAO strife comes as DeFi lenders compete to woo institutions dipping their toes into onchain finance.
Many protocols are compromising on decentralisation, openness and transparency in order to make themselves more attractive to investors used to the closed, permissioned world of traditional finance.
The question is if Aave is among the projects trading away those crypto ideals.
For Marc Zeller, founder of Aave DAO service provider Aave Chan Initiative, the answer is a resounding yes.
He slammed Aave Labsâ request for DAO funding, arguing that it didnât meet the same transparency standards that his organisation and other service providers hold themselves to.
âWe spent three years building a culture of accountability inside the Aave DAO,â Zeller said in a post on the Aave governance forum announcing ACIâs departure from the DAO. âWhen we applied those same standards to the entity requesting the largest budget in DAO history, the system stopped working.â
Whatâs more, Zeller and other DAO delegates have criticised Aave Labs employees for using their voting power to influence the Labs funding vote.
Zeller isnât the only critic of Aave Labsâ perceived control over the DAO.
âAave Labs believes that the whole Aave DAO and contributors should pivot in the direction they believe in, without sufficient consideration of existing contributorsâ expertise,â said BGD Labs when it announced plans to cease contributions to Aave in February.
âNo room for frictionâ
Kulechovâs response seems to affirm the concerns of the DAOâs service providers.
âThe DAO is taking a zero-bureaucracy approach,â he said in his Aave will win post. âThere is zero room for friction.â
It sounds like Kulechov is saying the quiet part out loud.
Most proponents say DAOs are meant to function like a democracy. Token holders entrust their voting power to delegates who propose protocol changes and debate them in an open forum.
Delegates often disagree, and thatâs recognised as healthy. Debate fosters intellectual growth, sparks innovation, and prevents groupthink, ultimately leading to better decision-making, so the argument goes.
So, if thereâs no room for âfriction,â as Kulechov puts it, is Aave DAO really a democracy, or something else?
Top DeFi stories of the week đ¤
Latest from DL Research
This week in DeFi governance âď¸
Post of the week đĽ
Hyperbridge joked about getting hacked on April Foolâs Day. The protocol got exploited 13 days later.
Got a tip about DeFi? Reach out at [email protected]
DL News is an independent news organisation that provides original, in-depth reporting on the largely misunderstood world of cryptocurrency and decentralised finance. From original stories to investigations, our journalism is accurate, honest and responsible.
Forwarded by a friend? Subscribe here.











